For Justice Germain, all Albertans, Canadians, et al.
IF Judge Germain can order persons to present “the other side of the argument”1 when preaching their beliefs — that is, present a side or narrative2 that such persons do not believe (a form of compelled speech?) — could our judge, in fairness, equity, and integrity listen to the other side of the argument of his COVID beliefs? and not judge till he has fairly and thoroughly heard both sides of the COVID argument?
Here is suggestion #02 for Judge Germain (et al.):
COVID: THE GRAND DELUSION – LEE MERRITT, MD (What is happening | October 9, 2021 | Time 57:21 ) at https://www.brighteon.com/b25e35a6-64da-4d58-aa0e-934bbbe1347c
COVID: THE GRAND DELUSION – LEE MERRITT, MD (Fact Seekers | October 8, 2021 | Time 57:20 ) at https://www.bitchute.com/video/tBrNIOtKmKOX/
*Definition of germane:
– being at once relevant and appropriate : FITTING
1. Anti-mask activists ordered by Calgary judge to preach science, too: Christopher Scott, Artur and Dawid Pawlowski found guilty of contempt in June | Meghan Grant· CBC News · Posted: Oct 13, 2021 | https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/calgary/pawlowski-brother-street-church-christopher-scott-contempt-1.6209420