(National Citizens Inquiry) So what have we learned from the past four years of fear and fabrication? If you have listened to even a smattering of NCI witnesses,1 you know “something is rotten,” (not just “in the state of Denmark,”2 but) in Canada and nigh every other nation. WHO3 knows, too, but it’s not confessing […]
The NCI Hearings Continue* Read More »
This is not just an appeal to government, but an appeal and invitation to citizens everywhere. No body, government or otherwise, should be able to violate the conscience of another through coercion without being called to account and to consequence. Let us keep up the pressure for consequence. Here is another email appeal sent to
Another Open Appeal: For the Sake of Conscience Read More »
Copy of an email sent to the National Citizens Inquiry (NCI), Fri 2023-12-15 9:23 PM Subject: Thank You and an 1839 Parallel? Greetings: NCI Commissioners: Dr. Bernard Massie, Ken Drysdale, Janice Kaikkonen, Heather DiGregorio; Lawyer Shawn Buckley, and other NCI staff and employees: You are probably not aware of this document written in 1839 to
“An Imperative Duty”? Read More »
Bald Eagle image info below footnotes* Do you remember the question George W. Bush attempted to answer on September 20, 2001 as he addressed a joint session of Congress1? — the question: “Why do they hate US?” This question has been considered several times over the past few years,2 but the most memorable response might
Bald Eagle: Symbol of What? Read More »
Today, October 13, 2022, the delayed inquiry began in Ottawa, Ontario Canada into the justification for the Public Order Emergency which was declared February 14, 2022 relating to the Canadian Freedom Convoy.1 We do not yet know the “terms of reference”2 that might limit the Commission findings, but we can be almost sure, if we
The Inquiry Begins? Read More »
For Justice Germain,1 all Albertans, Canadians, et al. IF there were ample evidence that the “novel” COVID-19 virus was not novel and that all the mandates were based on fraud, would Judge Germain (et al.) be willing, in fairness, equity, and integrity, to examine all the evidence? to honor the judicial rule of completeness2? Would
#03: Germane* Questions Read More »
For Justice Germain, all Albertans, Canadians, et al.IF Judge Germain can order persons to present “the other side of the argument”1 when preaching their beliefs — that is, present a side or narrative2 that such persons do not believe (a form of compelled speech?) — could our judge, in fairness, equity, and integrity listen to the other
#02: Germane* Questions Read More »