This post reproduces an email sent to Mark Holland (Leader of the Canadian Government in the House of Commons) and his 38 Federal Cabinet colleagues on February 7, 2022. It was titled: Pscience v. Science: —————————— To: Mark Holland (and his Cabinet colleagues) How are you able, in good conscience, to stand in question period […]
Heads-Up to the Federal Cabinet Read More »
Open Notice of Liability to Men & Women, Everywhere1 What are WE doing in déjà vu of 1930s-40s Germany? in déjà vu of hundreds of other repeats of crimes against humanity? Are we □ trusting in lies and liars? □ hiding from the truths of history and human nature — of what was, is, and
New Normal?* New Nuremberg?** Read More »
From Wikipedia1: An accessory is a person who assists in the commission of a crime, but who does not actually participate in the commission of the crime as a joint principal. The distinction between an accessory and a principal is a question of fact and degree: ● The principal is the one whose acts or
In the High Middle Ages (1000-1300 AD/CE), in order to combat religious instability (including but not limited to alleged heretics,[1]) the powers-that-were resorted to: 1) denunciations (openly and secretly);2) concealing the nature of charges and evidence against the accused;3) “invitations” to confess (something? anything?);4) torture to extract confessions;5) torture to extract the names of “guilty”
MORE THAN once upon a time! Read More »
(All indented paragraphs are partial quotes from, or are based on portions of, the Judgment at Nuremberg film script, screen play by Abby Mann.)Sixty-three years ago (1947), the United States conducted a trial examining the issue of individual complicity of justice officials in crimes committed while in the service of the German state. This trial